Before we turn to those, let me point out something useful that Heidegger in his lectures on Nietzsche observes, and that may be helpful if you read more Nietzsche.
The sublimest stroke in all this feeling of obligation came about in Christianity in which God Himself pays the age-old debt by sacrificing Himself for the guilt of mankind.
Or it is perhaps a festival celebrated when victory over the violator of the law has been achieved. Nietzsche tries to argue that eternal return is a real possibility, but I think he did not need that -- his point is sufficient as a thought experiment.
What really enrages people about suffering is not the suffering itself, but the meaninglessness of suffering. In brief, the artistic approach to asceticism is a shallow one which claims ascetic ideals but fails to actually partake in the doctrine in any way.
The ascetic life seems to be a contradiction: Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Note that Christians, and nearly all if not all theists, tend to implicitly accept what I have called Foundationalism about Purpose.
In dealing with this new unknown world they no longer had their old leader, the ruling unconscious drives which guided them safely.
I believe that N gives us a kind of portrait of his vision and his hopes for human purpose, and though he may be able to consistently reject in some sense some values by arguing that they are fake "morality"he still seems to be a foundationalist about purpose.
The sick woman, in particular: The strong should not be ashamed of their strength, and they must be quarantined from the sick if they are to maintain their strength.
We might call Christianity, in particular, a huge treasure house of clever forms of consolation—there are so many pleasant, soothing, and narcotizing things piled up in it, and for this purpose it takes so many dangerous and audacious chances.
He sees in "God" the ultimate contrast he is capable of discovering to his real and indissoluble animal instincts. Ascetic ideals spring up spontaneously everywhere on earth, in every time and culture. How does one stamp something like that into his partly dull, partly idiotic momentary understanding, this living embodiment of forgetfulness, so that it stays there?
Now that he has been embraced by a form of his knowing self, he has no consciousness any more of what is outer or inner. N believes this is compelling evidence for his central claim.
The transition is made with those numerous slave and indentured populations which adapted themselves to the divine cults of their masters, whether through compulsion or through obsequiousness and mimicry; from them this inheritance overflowed in all directions.
N instead begins with the claim that the concept of good started not as a label for unselfish acts, but rather as a label of distinguishing the noble in various senses from those to which the nobles considered themselves superior N seems to be willing to say, that nobles were in fact superior.
We may not like suffering, but we feel compelled to give it sense. This is quite interesting because it appears that only much more recently has this kind of claim been well understood about evolution I may be wrong, and would appreciate being set aright: Atheism and a kind of second innocence belong together.
Now, in a fit of pessimism, the prospect of a final installment must once and for all be denied.Friedrich Nietzsche published On the Genealogy of Morals in This period of Nietzsche's life is considered by many scholars to be his most productive and significant.
On the Genealogy of Morals was preceded in by Beyond Good and Evil, and both texts are concerned with similar ideas involving the historically constructed nature of morality.
Nietzsche’s response to such an objection can be found in third essay of the Genealogy: that cold, dispassionate quests for truth are too redolent of asceticism; a divorce of one’s will from one’s perspective; the laughable pretense of bird’s-eye objectivity.
INTRODUCTION TO Towards a Genealogy of Morals This short book consists of a preface and three essays of 'polemic' which follow on from the concepts of 'goodness' which the German Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche had presented in Beyond Good and Evil, ().
Third Essay A Few Notes about the Will to Power, The Overman, Eternal Return, and the Aesthetic Reading of Nietzsche The Genealogy is an accessible work by N, and one that is not too long to squeeze in before Being and Time, but it does leave unstated two important elements of N's thought: the concept of the will to power, of the Ubermensch, and of eternal return.
96 GENEALOGY OF MORALS Third Essay What Is the Meaning of Ascetic Ideals? Unconcerned, TJmU) ESSAY, SECTION 3 99 ists. A summary of Third Essay, Sections in Friedrich Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Genealogy of Morals and what it means.
Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.Download