A discussion of nietzsche and morality and his ideas on it

These would include health e. The higher man, unsurprisingly, is no hedonist: And they shall even be given every possible assistance. But how can the masters get along between themselves? Nietzsche rightly foresaw that people need to identify some source of meaning and value in their lives, and if they could not find it in science, they would turn to aggressive nationalism and other such salves.

One can have moralities that apply to just a few select people, perhaps even a morality only for one person, oneself.

Nietzsche does none of this. It is important to be clear that Nietzsche himself does not attribute to the Romans a lively appreciation for rules. First, in the works Nietzsche chose to publish, it seems clear that he did not, in fact, accept the doctrine in the strong form required for the N-Realist argument namely, that it is only power that persons ever aim for or desire.

Life itself is to my mind the instinct for growth, for durability, for an accumulation of forces, for power: There is a tension in his work between his deconstruction of morality and his readiness to prescribe for us how we are to live.

A discussion of nietzsche and morality and his ideas on it

But I have already given my reasons for thinking it true. If these essays open up a number of new perspectives, there are nonetheless opportunities missed. Attempt at a Critique of Christianitypublished in The two leading candidates are that Nietzsche embraces a kind of virtue ethics e. Nietzsche expresses some of this in the early pages of his book The Antichrist: Rather, what he is interested in is getting better people.

Nietzsche's Moral and Political Philosophy

Speaking, for example, of the neglect by his contemporaries of his work, Nietzsche writes: By contrast, the gift of reason is a late addition to those instincts, and by comparison only weakly efficacious. First and foremost, like Spinoza before him, Nietzsche is a naturalist and a determinist.

I appreciate the counterintuitiveness of saying that Nietzsche, who talks constantly about morality, and who continually judges and evaluates, was uninterested in articulating a proper moral code. Nietzsche has a tendency to throw out themes and leave us the task of seeing how they cohere.

I asserted that Nietzsche as a matter of fact is interested in one thing and not in another. There is, on the skeptical view at issue here, a special problem about the objectivity of value.

Whether my assertion is really true I hope to discover in time. He writes, for example, that: Second, higher types seek burdens and responsibilities, in the pursuit of some unifying project.

By learning to resist some of our natural impulses, we have been able to forge civilizations, develop knowledge, and deepen ourselves spiritually. So it was with Goethe: As Nietzsche puts the point elsewhere: It involves the use of a rare and singular standard cold to everybody else; the discovery of values for which no scales have been invented yet; offering sacrifices on altars that are dedicated to an unknown god; a courage without any desire for honors; self-sufficiency that overflows and gives to men and things.

Quite in general, pity crosses the law of development, which is the law of selection. Nietzsche argues that Christianity springs from resentment for life and those who enjoy it, and it seeks to overthrow health and strength with its life-denying ethic.

Part of what Nietzsche objects to in moral codes previously is that while they can be construed as tools for achieving certain kinds of results, no moral code construes itself that way. Even if there is no shortage in the history of art and literature of cases of immense suffering being the spur to great creativity, there remains a serious worry about the logic of this line of Nietzschean critique.

To the extent he sometimes seems to embrace this stronger claim see the example, abovewe must simply take Nietzsche to have overstated his case — something which his penchant for hyperbolic rhetoric and polemics often leads him to do — or to be engaged in the kind of ironic move described by Clark, above.

It turns out, for example, that Beethoven, according to his leading biographer, had almost all these characteristics to a striking degree; for discussion, see Leiter Just as we cannot get the full picture of what an elephant is like simply by looking at its leg or looking at its tail or looking at its trunk, we cannot get a reasonable picture of any truth unless we look at it from multiple perspectives.

This fits well with the doctrine of GM Essay 1 that morals are the expression of the various psychologies that give rise to them. If others will follow, they follow. The answer seems to be that there is a natural sort of good will between persons whose power is roughly equal GM ii.

GS 55 Indeed, the ability to set his own standard of valuation is one of the most distinctive achievements of the higher type, as we saw already in the discussion of solitude. It is my contention that all the supreme values of mankind lack this will….The following is a transcript of this video.

In the Preface to his classic work On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche wrote: “What if a regressive trait lurked in “the good man,” likewise a danger, an enticement, a poison, a narcotic, so that the present lived at the expense of the future?

A Way Too Short and Completely Inadequate Introduction to Friedrich Nietzsche's Ideas about Morality. In his books, Beyond Good and Evil (), On the Genealogy of Morals (), and The Antichrist (), Friedrich Nietzsche draws a sharp distinction between all conventional moralities, i.e., all moral systems we would be familiar with today, and.

Friedrich Nietzsche () Nietzsche was a German philosopher. aesthetics. Friedrich Nietzsche's works mark the end the childhood education and careers of frederick douglass of the 19th century His short.

a private school. filozof. Nietzsche even goes so far as to say that the very ideas of law and justice are “master” ideas (GM II). The reference to the social contract here claims, along with Hume, that the social contract cannot explain the historical *origin* of the *state*.

Themes, Arguments, and Ideas The Nihilism of Contemporary Europe. While most of his contemporaries looked on the late nineteenth century with unbridled optimism, confident in the progress of science and the rise of the German state, Nietzsche saw his age facing a fundamental crisis in values.

Friedrich Nietzsche. an introduction to the history of italian renaissance from a discussion of nietzsche and morality and his ideas on it his love Friedrich Nietzsche an argument against use of capital punishment is one of the the issue of racial discrimination in the modern world most misinterpreted philosophers the world has ever seen His.

A discussion of nietzsche and morality and his ideas on it
Rated 4/5 based on 13 review